Federation overview
Everything here is parsed from results already published on IANSEO. What counts is set by Data included in the header, and every figure below obeys it.
Youth pathway — who is still shooting a season later
Cohorts of eight or more, where the following season is complete.
Field depth against a fixed standard
Share of a class clearing the all-time 75th percentile for that exact division, class and round type — so 30m juniors are never compared with 70m seniors.
Participation
Athletes
Search any archer to see qualification form, Olympic-round record, who they meet most often and how they fare against them.
Qualification round
Seventy-two arrows at a fixed distance, scored per arrow. It is the half of the sport that rewards repeatability — and the only half where two archers can be compared without ever having met. Only within the same class and distance: a 30m U13 average and a 70m senior average are different units.
Class leaderboard
Best average arrow each archer has recorded in this class, with how many entries it rests on. One entry is a day, not a level.
Who is moving
Average arrow gained or lost per entry, by ordinary least squares across an archer's entries in one class. Four entries minimum — below that a slope is a mood, not a trend.
Rising
Falling
Most repeatable
Smallest spread across entries, among archers with four or more in a class. A low spread with a low average is consistency at the wrong level, so the average is shown beside it.
The standard, class by class
The all-time 75th-percentile average arrow for each class and distance — the line the depth chart on the overview measures against.
Olympic round
Head to head is a different sport. A ranking round rewards consistency over 72 arrows; a bracket is decided in three-arrow sets against one opponent, where a 720 counts for nothing once it starts. Never mixed into one number.
Records below cover the selected events.
Beating better seeds
Wins against an archer seeded above them — the thing qualification rank cannot show — with what it cost them.
Head-to-head records
Four or more decided matches.
Competitions
Published standings, unaggregated. If you were at an event, this is the fastest way to check we read it correctly.
Team standings
Teams that posted a qualification score at this competition. A team's total is the sum of its members' individual scores, so these are the same arrows as the standings above, added up a second way — not a second performance. Rank is the team's qualification position; team medals are decided in the elimination rounds, which this corpus does not yet hold.
All competitions
Data quality
An analytics page that hides its gaps is worse than no page at all.
What to check when looking up an archer
Check the competition, name, club and event category against the published result. We connect an archer’s records across competitions using the name typed on each entry, so spelling differences can split one person’s history and shared names can merge two people into one.
A missing result does not mean the archer did not compete. It may mean the event is not in the collection, or that their name was entered differently that day.
Discovery coverage — where we have actually looked
IANSEO gives every competition a number, in order, so the honest question is not how many events we hold but which stretches of numbers we have actually checked. Inside a checked stretch, we know what IANSEO holds and what it does not. Outside one, competitions were found by searching, which can show an event exists and can never show that one does not.
What checking every number can and cannot tell you. It can tell you that no competition was published to IANSEO in that stretch. It cannot tell you that no competition was held. A tournament scored on paper, or run on other software, leaves nothing here to find — so this is a complete record of what IANSEO was used for, not of Philippine archery.
Scope judgments — what a person ruled in or out
A competition enters this corpus because its page named a Philippine place, or because a Filipino appeared in its entry list. Both tests misfire, so some competitions are ruled on by hand. Two different verdicts: excluded means the event is not Philippine sport at all and a marker matched it by accident; held abroad means it is Philippine sport that happened overseas, and it counts. Conflating the two is how a Filipino competing abroad gets deleted along with a foreign club meet.
This table is read from the overrides file the pipeline obeys, not written out beside it, so it cannot drift from what actually happened.
The limit, stated. Scope follows the archer, not the venue — but an archer is only findable where the published pages name the Philippines. A Filipino entered under a foreign club at a foreign event, with no earlier record in this corpus to match against, stays invisible. Nothing in the published data closes that; the rule only narrows it.
Where comparisons need care
Limits this comparison means the gap changes what you can conclude. Worth knowing means the coverage or method needs context. Addressed means we have accounted for it, with any remaining limit stated.
How complete is each season?
Fewer recorded competitions or entries may be a gap in our collection rather than a decline in the sport. Do not compare a part-finished season with a completed one as though both cover the same period.